please correct me if i got something wrong. bogofilter seems to be a lot faster than spamassassin. as far as i understood bogofilter uses Bayesian filtering while spamassassin uses Bayesian filtering and analyses the mail headers. SARE_RMML_Stock1=0.21, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no I installed spamassassin and bogofilter and they work quite well, but Im wondering if one of them would be sufficient. X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.71 tagged_above=-10 required=5 Messages sent from thunderbird look perfectly fine : ZimbraMtaMyNetworks: 127.0.0.0/8 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24 Rspamd-spamness is an add-on for visualizing Rspamd spam scores generated on the server-side and embedded in message headers. Received: from (localhost.localdomain )īy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7C5900C3Īs you can see, even the ALL_TRUSTED rule is not fired., even though I have zimbraMtaMyNetworks set as : Received: from ()īy localhost ( ) (amavisd-new, port 10024) SHORT_HELO_AND_INLINE_IMAGE=1.39] autolearn=no X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.137 tagged_above=-10 required=5 SpamAssassin is the program which is going to help you flag spam emails.
#THUNDERBIRD SPAMASSASSIN WINDOWS#
One of our user is using the web interface to connect to his account (the others use thunderbird), and when sending a message to another internal user, he gets very strange spamassassin scores and his messages end up in the spam folder.Ĭould anyone explain to me what is wrong in this message ? How do I create signature with Mozilla Thunderbird In Windows / Linux OS.
0 kommentar(er)
